I
have been fascinated with the life and times of King Arthur and his Knights of
the Round Table since I was a child — I guess growing up a stone’s throw from
Glastonbury (The Ancient Isle of Avalon) may have had something to do with
that.
My
book series, The Du Lac Chronicles, tells the story of what happened after the
death of Arthur, and continues the story of his Knights and their sons. But to
write about the end of Arthur’s reign, I needed to know about the beginning. A
not so easy task, it turned out.
The
history of a historical Arthur is not written in stone but is,
instead, engraved in folklore, and that brings its own set of challenges.
Firstly,
where did Arthur come from? Well, that is an easy question to answer…
King
Arthur was English. No, he was Welsh. Arthur was Scottish. He was from
Brittany. Oh, for goodness’ sake, he was a Roman General!
Which
is right? Arthur is so famous that everyone wants to claim him and, over the
years, there have been many names thrown out there as to who he really was. But
we mustn’t forget that when we are dealing with Arthur, we are digging up
folklore, and that is not the same as excavating relics. We can make Arthur fit
wherever we want him to, and that is where the problem lies. It is very easy to
make mistakes, and I have read many books that claim to have found the real
Arthur, only they haven’t, it is just a theory, sometimes a very shaky one.
The
same can be said for Arthur’s famous castle, Camelot. There have been many possible locations for one of the most
famous castles in history. Tintagel, Cadbury
Hill, Caerlaverock Castle, have all been put forward. However, during
all this excitement and discoveries we have overlooked a fundamental issue —
there was no Camelot. It was an invention of a French poet in 1180! How can you
look for something that was never there to begin with?
King Arthur statue at Tintagel Castle by Rubin Eynon |
The Dark Ages, in which my books are set, is equally challenging to research because there is a lack of reliable primary resources. What was written down was written down for a purpose and that purpose was usually politically motivated, which in itself is fascinating, although not so helpful. Now, in these early texts when Arthur is mentioned, there is nothing about him being a king. Nennuis describes him as a warrior on par with Ironman, but no mention of a crown.
It
isn’t until the 12th Century when Geoffrey of Monmouth writes his
great work that the Arthur we know is born. The History of The Kings of
Briton was meant to be a historically accurate account of British
History and for many, many, years what Monmouth wrote was considered factually
correct. Of course, we now know it was anything but. However, that does not
mean that Monmouth’s work is of no particular value. Monmouth borrowed heavily
from folklore, and it is his story
that drives the legend of Arthur and his Knights forward. I think Monmouth’s
book is incredibly important as it tells us a great deal about, not only the
era, but also about the people who were listening to his stories. And if we dig
a little further, we can discover that it wasn’t only the populous who loved
listening to Arthurian tales. Those ever practical monks at Glastonbury Abbey
did as well.
Let’s
take a journey back to 12th Century England…
A terrible fire had spread through Glastonbury Abbey, and unfortunately for the monks, they did not have the coffers to pay for the repairs. If only they could encourage more pilgrims to come to the Abbey. What could they do?
Glastonbury Abbey |
Thanks
to Monmouth’s book “Arthur Fever” had
gripped the nation. People would pay good money to go on a pilgrimage to
Arthur’s final resting place. All that was needed was a good story and a grave.
The monks of Glastonbury announced to the world that they had discovered
Arthur’s final resting place. That brought in the crowds. Glastonbury Abbey soon
had the coffers to make the repairs and then some. There was as much truth in
the story of Glastonbury Abbey and King Arthur’s grave as there was in The History of the Kings of Briton. But
for hundreds of years, both the Abbey and Monmouth were believed.
My
books are not just set in Britain, but France as well, so I needed to have a
good understanding of what was happening in both of these countries in the 5th
/ 6th Century to keep the history real in the telling. But, before I
could look at France, I needed to have an understanding of what was happening
in the Western Roman Empire during this time. By 476 C.E. the last emperor of
the Western Roman Empire had been overthrown. The stability that the Roman Empire had brought to Western Europe for
over 1000 years was no more.
This
dawning new era brings us some of the most fascinating historical figures that
ever lived. These were the days of men such as Clovis. Clovis won a decisive
victory against Rome, at the Battle of Soissons in AD 486. But, Clovis’
ambition didn’t stop there. Roman Gaul and parts of Western Germany fell to him
as well. He forged a new empire through blood, war, and marriage. He made Paris
the capital of his new kingdom, and he was the first King of a united Frank
(France).
Jpeg of Clovis I
The
Saxons and the Angles crossed the South Sea to take advantage of vulnerable
Britain who, since the Romans had left, had split back into various smaller
kingdoms. There was much infighting and unrest. It was the perfect opportunity
for the Saxon’s to come over and stake their claim.
While
all this was going on, the Church was creeping into the crevices, and spreading
the word of God and, what could be considered of equal value, one language —
Latin. It could be argued that it was the Church that united Britain in the
end.
This
was a time of great unrest and change, but one thing remained constant for the
general populous and that was storytelling. Arthur may well have been a general
but folklore made him a Christian King and gave him a castle full of noble
knights. Arthur and his Knights (most of them anyway) cared about the people
they represented. Arthur was a good king, the like of which has never been seen
before or after. He was the perfect tool for spreading a type of patriotic
propaganda. Arthur was someone you would want to fight by your side. But he
also gave ordinary people a sense of belonging and hope. He is, after all, as
T.H White so elegantly put it — The Once
and Future King.
King Arthur by Charles Earnest Butler. |
I
have tried to show what life was like in the 5th /6th Century in my books, but
I have been heavily influenced by folklore because when you are dealing with
this period in history, you cannot dismiss it. Brittany, for example, is
terribly difficult to research historically during this era, because what was
written was unfortunately lost during the Viking invasion. However, when it
comes to folklore, Brittany is rich and if that is all she is going to give us,
then so be it.
The Carnac Stones, Brittany. Local Legend claims that the stones were once a Roman Legion. The great sorcerer, Merlin, turned the Legion to stone. |
Folklore
is its own particular brand of history, and it is often overlooked by
historians, which I think is a shame. You can tell a lot about a people by the
stories they tell, and people are still fascinated by this larger-than-life
King, which I think, says it all. Arthur may well have been a general, or a
knight, he may have been English, he may not, but it doesn’t matter because his
story is timeless, it will never grow old.
No comments:
Post a Comment